Information for "Why Verge3D if we have Three.js?"
From Verge3D Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchBasic information
| Display title | Why Verge3D if we have Three.js? |
| Default sort key | Why Verge3D if we have Three.js? |
| Page length (in bytes) | 7,136 |
| Page ID | 59 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
Page protection
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Edit history
| Page creator | Alexander (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 18:23, 11 August 2021 |
| Latest editor | Alexander (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 20:08, 1 May 2024 |
| Total number of edits | 57 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 2 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Page properties
| Transcluded template (1) | Template used on this page: |
SEO properties
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Herein we compare Verge3D with the popular WebGL library Three.js trying to elaborate the main differences between these two. What Verge3D users pay money for? |
Article image: (image)This attribute controls the content of the og:image element. This image is mostly displayed as a thumbnail on social media. |  |
Keywords: (keywords)This attribute controls the content of the keywords and article:tag elements. |
|
