We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.

scalare

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 181 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Help with Safari on iPhone and annotations #18832
    scalare
    Customer

    Hey Ryan, very impressive what you’ve accomplished! A bit off-topic: can I ask you what tool you’ve used for that? Was it meshroom? And have you tried/been able to create meshes out of photos of shiny metallic objects? I’ve found that as particularly difficult (resulting meshes get holes where surfaces are shiny)

    Thank you!

    in reply to: Verge3D 2.15 pre1 available! #18825
    scalare
    Customer

    Thanks a lot for making sounds work dynamically! :yahoo:

    in reply to: Generate normal map – documentation #18824
    scalare
    Customer

    Wow! Thank you very much, HoboCat for sharing your experience with the engravings. Your method is so much closer to what we want to achieve! We’ll surely try that out along with the techniques in Mikhail’s demo. How is that coming, by the way? :)

    Thank you all!

    in reply to: Generate normal map – documentation #18427
    scalare
    Customer

    OK, thanks a lot, Mikhail!

    in reply to: Generate normal map – documentation #18424
    scalare
    Customer

    Yes, I’ve tried that. But I still see it as a bevel effect, where only the edges of fonts show something when the normal map is applied, but not the inner area of the font, that still shows as if it was at the same level of the surrounding surface (background of the normal map)

    The attached example, has
    Strength: 5
    Level: 2
    Blur/Sharp: -3

    I see it blurred, but only on the font edges. Any way to extend that blurring into the inner part of the fonts?

    Thanks a lot!

    in reply to: Generate normal map – documentation #18422
    scalare
    Customer

    Excellent! Thank you!

    One more question: when a texture is created from text, because of the text being black and the background white, the resulting normal map is kind of hard, even when reducing strength or increasing the level. If we wanted the engraving to look “softer” or “more rounded”, how would we do it? The “inner part” of the resulting normal map fonts looks flat and as if the height of the normals was the same as outside of the fonts (I hope this makes sense). Is there any way to soften the black and white texture BEFORE we convert to a normal map?

    In that online converter, for example, the circles black and white texture is soft (there almost isn’t a place where you can find absolute black or absolute white, and certainly not where black and white pixels are contiguous). But I haven’t been able to do that “softness” with the create texture from text puzzle.

    in reply to: Generate normal map – documentation #18420
    scalare
    Customer

    Thank you!

    in reply to: Generate normal map – documentation #18417
    scalare
    Customer

    Thank you, Yuri. So Invert G and Invert R don’t do anything? I’ve tested changing values for invert height, but I did not notice any changes there.

    Also, we’re creating a texture from text, that generates the image as black text on white background. I think this is right for an engraving. But what if we needed to do it in the opposite direction? Since the invert height seems not to do anything, we’d need to invert the original texture colors. Please advise.

    In any case, would you please recommend which values to use to simulate an engraving? :)

    in reply to: Generate normal map – documentation #18413
    scalare
    Customer

    I should add that I’ve been able to create the texture, convert it to a normal map, and replace it into the material. What I need to know is how the additional parameters work: invert G, invert R, invert height, the two filters, etc.

    Thanks!

    in reply to: Dynamic sounds #18211
    scalare
    Customer

    Excellent! Thank you!

    in reply to: Verge3D 2.14 for Blender Released #17987
    scalare
    Customer

    Excellent! Thanks a lot!

    in reply to: Verge3D 2.14 pre3 available! #17986
    scalare
    Customer

    Hi elk,

    I’m subscribed to browserstack.com, which let’s you test your pages in lots of different devices via a web interface. You can choose OS, device and browser. And for many of them, there is a developer tool option available, that works just like the desktop developer tools for Chrome/firefox or firebug. It lets you even test on your local server if you install an add-on for some desktop browsers. Very handy! Unfortunately, it is not free.
    You can interact with the device almost like if you were holding it (not for all events, though. Orbiting the camera for example, is delayed in iPhone, but still very useful)
    Hope it helps!

    in reply to: Verge3D 2.14 pre3 available! #17939
    scalare
    Customer

    For some reason I was not able to see the full console log. I refreshed the page again and I saw the rest, which matched the errors mentioned by zjbcool. I downloaded the fixed version and that solved the issue. Thank you!

    in reply to: Verge3D 2.14 pre3 available! #17923
    scalare
    Customer

    Never mind about the version number. That is something we have added when loading v3d.js. We’ve removed that, but the errors still show.

    in reply to: Verge3D 2.14 pre3 available! #17922
    scalare
    Customer

    Hi Yuri,

    we’ve replaced the version with 2.14.3 and we’re getting weird errors ONLY on iPhone. Not happening on Android or desktop. The errors go like this:

    WebGL: INVALID_OPERATION: drawElements: unable to simulate vertexAttrib0 array
    And when we expand the message:

    useProgram @ [native code]:1
    useProgram @ v3d.js?ver=2.9.2:1
    ge @ v3d.js?ver=2.9.2:1
    renderBufferDirect @ v3d.js?ver=2.9.2:1
    me @ v3d.js?ver=2.9.2:1
    fe @ v3d.js?ver=2.9.2:1
    render @ v3d.js?ver=2.9.2:1
    render @ v3d.js?ver=2.9.2:1
    render @ v3d.js?ver=2.9.2:1
    render @ v3d.js?ver=2.9.2:1
    render @ v3d.js?ver=2.9.2:1
    (anonymous function) @ v3d.js?ver=2.9.2:1
    (anonymous function) @ v3d.js?ver=2.9.2:1
    a @ v3d.js?ver=2.9.2:1

    There are lots of instances of the same error. That version number for v3d.js is suspicious.

    Please let me know if I should go back to 2.14.2 for the time being. Thank you!

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 181 total)