Home › Forums › General Questions › Procedural Vs Baked UV Images – Special Case
- This topic has 7 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 5 years, 1 month ago by
Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
2020-01-05 at 9:16 pm #22566
GLiFTeK
CustomerHi,
I’ve always practiced baking procedural textures for efficiency in 3D work.
But when it comes to a trade off of Verge’s ability to animate values of my procedural textures, I’m holding off on it.Is this going to be an issue in performance, given the (rather simple) procedural I’m using here?
It’s procedural lines that form a makeshift “ideal” smooth wireframe texture.
I don’t see any observable slowdown in using them vs the baked versions.
Obviously i get the benefit of being able to animate, AND they’re scalable (no pixelation on zooming in)Is this type of thing going to hamper me if it’s used across many objects?
(ALSO.. can we use SVGs as image textures?? or in anything in webgl? )
Thanks!
Visit the GLIFTEK Verge3D Plugins Store!
GLIFTEK.com for Plugin Documentation & LIVE DEMOS!
LIKE The GLIFTEK Facebook Page for updates!
Join the Verge 3D Discord Server!
plz share Discord link & on your signature!2020-01-06 at 8:22 am #22577Anonymous
InactiveI think you are wrong when you think, that you will lose performance if you not bake your procedural textures. I am not really 100% sure what I am saying, but I made some Experiment with my christmas postacard project.
I know, the project is very slow now but the reason for that is Ambient-Occlusion and water rendering (screen space) and not that much procedural Textures.
If you look at the stars, the count of them is around 200 with procedural animated texture/material. So my experiment was to check if performance will go down when I start to animated the textures. Very little. Also the water has a procedural animated texture, This has not much influence on performance, I swear.2020-01-06 at 8:26 am #22578Anonymous
Inactiveif you load baked textures, it will more influence the performance as when you leave it procedural – my observation, maybe I am wrong but I try to avoid textures now, since I discovered that it dosn’t make issues. If I am wrong, I would love to have more information about that
2020-01-06 at 8:36 am #22580Anonymous
InactiveBTW: this is the main reason, why I hang on Verge3D which make it possible to work efficient with procedural materials. Vanila gltf dosn’t support this. Its mean everything must be baked and visual Experience is limited.
2020-01-06 at 8:46 am #22586Anonymous
Inactiveit is logical, the browser has to load each image, which means, all that bits. Procedural texture is mathematical procedure without increasing bits values into the browser directly
2020-01-06 at 8:53 am #22587Anonymous
InactiveSVG – yes you can use it in WebGL (I use it)
2020-01-06 at 9:08 am #22591GLiFTeK
CustomerSVG – yes you can use it in WebGL (I use it)
use SVG as scalable image textures?
thanks for the responses. that’s what i was thinking! :)
Visit the GLIFTEK Verge3D Plugins Store!
GLIFTEK.com for Plugin Documentation & LIVE DEMOS!
LIKE The GLIFTEK Facebook Page for updates!
Join the Verge 3D Discord Server!
plz share Discord link & on your signature!2020-01-06 at 9:26 am #22594Anonymous
InactiveI use svg for interface design (buttons etc.), because of little bits.
You need to know that svg could have security issue… but I do not care for that, we gona have 3d world war…. who is interested for my christmas postcard or something. But if you work on security relevant projects, avoid svg -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.