Loops - is "i" necessary or just a name for individual object in group?

This topic has 39 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 11 months ago by c4cc.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 40 total)

1 2 3 →

Author

Posts
2024-03-07 at 8:26 am #71386

c4cc
Participant

For example:

https://www.soft8soft.com/docs/files/puzzles/puzzles-loops-for-each-example.jpg

Is “i” actually required to get the loop running through list, or can you put another name like “target”?

2024-03-07 at 8:37 am #71388

kdv
Participant

You can rename “i” as you wish. It’s a local variable that is visible and working only inside a loop.

Puzzles and JS coding. Fast and expensive.

If you don’t see the meaning in something it primarily means that you just don’t see it but not the absence of the meaning at all.

2024-03-07 at 8:42 am #71389

c4cc
Participant

Thanks, btw, can you help me here please? It’s a loop through a clone list, each clone assigned a dict.

2024-03-07 at 8:52 am #71390

kdv
Participant

Create a simplified app, attach it here and in this case it will be possible to find out what you want.

Puzzles and JS coding. Fast and expensive.

If you don’t see the meaning in something it primarily means that you just don’t see it but not the absence of the meaning at all.

2024-03-07 at 9:13 am #71392
c4cc
Participant
The link i mentioned earlier explained what I needed:

Loop clones for a similar function?

The puzzles in question:
- This reply was modified 11 months, 3 weeks ago by c4cc.
2024-03-07 at 10:58 am #71395

kdv
Participant

You didn’t get the point. You puzzles are useless, they cannot be tested without the main part of your app. Just looking at the screenshot there is nothing to say It’s like a couple of words torn from the whole text. Nobody even tries.

Puzzles and JS coding. Fast and expensive.

If you don’t see the meaning in something it primarily means that you just don’t see it but not the absence of the meaning at all.

2024-03-07 at 2:11 pm #71402
c4cc
Participant
Done, here is a test app as per attachments. Puzzles:

Basically, I want clones as individuals to only disappear and explode when they come into contact with the red object (player). Not all disappear together. How do I do this?
- This reply was modified 11 months, 3 weeks ago by c4cc.
- This reply was modified 11 months, 3 weeks ago by c4cc.
- This reply was modified 11 months, 3 weeks ago by c4cc.
- This reply was modified 11 months, 3 weeks ago by c4cc.
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.
2024-03-08 at 5:55 pm #71423

kdv
Participant

Should work exactly like here https://v3d.net/trh

Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.
Puzzles and JS coding. Fast and expensive.

If you don’t see the meaning in something it primarily means that you just don’t see it but not the absence of the meaning at all.

2024-03-09 at 7:13 am #71446

c4cc
Participant

Thanks for the reply. Sorry for being late.

kdv wrote:

Should work exactly like here https://v3d.net/trh

While the individual clones do disappear when touched, their explosions follow around the player. I’d like the explosions to remain in place where the clone is removed.

2024-03-09 at 10:17 am #71447

kdv
Participant

Remove one puzzle and they won’t follow. It’s initially your puzzles and it’s you who added this following.

Puzzles and JS coding. Fast and expensive.

If you don’t see the meaning in something it primarily means that you just don’t see it but not the absence of the meaning at all.

2024-03-09 at 10:29 am #71448

c4cc
Participant

Found the problem.

kdv wrote:

Should work exactly like here https://v3d.net/trh

I’ll try this out and let you know ASAP, thanks

Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.

2024-03-09 at 10:33 am #71450

kdv
Participant

c4cc wrote:

Found the problem.

Just remove the “parent to object” puzzle. Why did you add it? It’s not needed at all in this case.

Puzzles and JS coding. Fast and expensive.

If you don’t see the meaning in something it primarily means that you just don’t see it but not the absence of the meaning at all.

2024-03-09 at 3:27 pm #71452

c4cc
Participant

My bad. I was so tired, I failed to see that mistake

2024-03-09 at 9:01 pm #71453
c4cc
Participant
kdv wrote:

Should work exactly like here https://v3d.net/trh

Attached is the variant of what you posted here. Yet not only could the clones not disappear when individually touched, the clones’ template went missing for some reason. What went wrong?
- This reply was modified 11 months, 2 weeks ago by c4cc.
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.
2024-03-09 at 11:23 pm #71455

kdv
Participant

Your logic went wrong. See the last loop with more attention.

Puzzles and JS coding. Fast and expensive.

If you don’t see the meaning in something it primarily means that you just don’t see it but not the absence of the meaning at all.
Author

Posts