Hiding objects to improve verge3d performance?

This topic has 30 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 4 months ago by c4cc.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 31 total)

1 2 3 →

Author

Posts
2023-10-27 at 3:37 am #67967

c4cc
Participant

I want to improve overall performance, especially regarding Frame Per Second. If (larger) objects take up more memory, can I hide them and then unload them later in the scene? Especially whenever the camera scrolls/pans over to that part?

To save more browser space/memory, and improve FPS rate, by hiding objects only to reveal them when the camera moves over to that part of scene/level/area.

Example:
In any (2d) game, any assets/objects not on screen is hidden, but when the player moves across a level/area, more assets/objects initially hidden are shown.

2023-10-27 at 7:17 am #67970

c4cc
Participant

Trying to eliminate problems like these

Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.

2023-10-27 at 7:52 am #67972

kdv
Participant

Your raptor alone takes up the lion’s share of render calls and tris rendered.

All other meshes are rendered only if they are in the camera’s field of view.

Puzzles and JS coding. Fast and expensive.

If you don’t see the meaning in something it primarily means that you just don’t see it but not the absence of the meaning at all.

2023-10-28 at 8:48 am #67996

c4cc
Participant

lol, where did you get my raptor file from? So how do I reduce render calls, and triangles rendered as much as possible?

My current Performance Profile:

2023-10-28 at 8:55 am #67998

kdv
Participant

c4cc wrote:

lol, where did you get my raptor file from?

Your files are all over the forum.

c4cc wrote:

So how do I reduce render calls, and triangles rendered as much as possible?

Optimize your model.

Puzzles and JS coding. Fast and expensive.

If you don’t see the meaning in something it primarily means that you just don’t see it but not the absence of the meaning at all.

2023-10-28 at 9:43 am #68000
c4cc
Participant
kdv wrote:

Your files are all over the forum.

Only once did I upload my file here, but other than that, I didn’t
- This reply was modified 1 year ago by c4cc.
2023-10-28 at 9:56 am #68002

kdv
Participant

And here, and here, and here and in many other topics…

Puzzles and JS coding. Fast and expensive.

If you don’t see the meaning in something it primarily means that you just don’t see it but not the absence of the meaning at all.

2023-10-28 at 10:01 am #68003

c4cc
Participant

True, but I’m talking about this Petra model

kdv wrote:

Your raptor alone takes up the lion’s share of render calls and tris rendered.

All other meshes are rendered only if they are in the camera’s field of view.

<iframe loading=”lazy” title=”render calls and tris rendered” width=”640″ height=”360″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/d8E67aJxZNg?feature=oembed” frameborder=”0″ allow=”accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share” allowfullscreen=””></iframe>

2023-10-28 at 10:06 am #68004

kdv
Participant

*facepalm*

c4cc wrote:

lol, where did you get my raptor file from?

from here:

c4cc wrote:

Only once did I upload my file here

ok?

Puzzles and JS coding. Fast and expensive.

If you don’t see the meaning in something it primarily means that you just don’t see it but not the absence of the meaning at all.

2023-10-28 at 10:25 am #68005
c4cc
Participant
Sorry for the stupid question, just wanted to confirm lol
- This reply was modified 1 year ago by c4cc.
2023-10-28 at 11:56 am #68007

kdv
Participant

In ideal, you can reduce geometry buffers and render calls for this raptor to just 5 (if you use bones for animations). The triangles count is not so significant.

Puzzles and JS coding. Fast and expensive.

If you don’t see the meaning in something it primarily means that you just don’t see it but not the absence of the meaning at all.

2023-10-28 at 1:51 pm #68008

c4cc
Participant

Thanks for the heads up. Why do bones for animations reduce geometry buffers and render calls for this raptor to just 5?

Reason I don’t use bones for animations is that they’re harder to use, and distort an otherwise mechanical character.

2023-10-28 at 2:05 pm #68009

kdv
Participant

Your raptor consists of 76 separate meshes. One mesh with one material -> one geometry buffer and one render call. Some meshes are multi-material meshes. One mesh with three materials -> three geometry buffers and three render calls. As a result you’ve got 100+ geometry buffers and render calls per one raptor. If you merge all meshes into one mesh and remove duplicate materials you’ll get one mesh with 5 materials -> 5 render calls. But in this case you can’t animate separate parts of you raptor as you did it before. That’s where bones can help.

Puzzles and JS coding. Fast and expensive.

If you don’t see the meaning in something it primarily means that you just don’t see it but not the absence of the meaning at all.

2023-10-28 at 2:16 pm #68010
c4cc
Participant
Fair points, well detailed explanation. Sadly, mechanical parts need to be separately animated, otherwise, will look rubber-ish and unnatural in movement. Like a stretchy cartoon character
- This reply was modified 1 year ago by c4cc.
2023-10-28 at 2:27 pm #68012

kdv
Participant

You just need to read a liitle more about rigged animations. Any mechanism can be animated using bones.

Puzzles and JS coding. Fast and expensive.

If you don’t see the meaning in something it primarily means that you just don’t see it but not the absence of the meaning at all.
Author

Posts