We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.

AWS vs AZURE? Is one better for hosting/streaming Verge3D interactions?

Home Forums General Questions AWS vs AZURE? Is one better for hosting/streaming Verge3D interactions?

Tagged: , , ,

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #40985
    patrickbelt
    Customer

    Hello,

    The company I work for wants to integrate the Verge3D interactions I build for them on their website. They also want to be able to host and stream the Verge 3D interactions to iPads used by their sales team around the world, as well as virtual tradeshows. Unfortunately we wouldn’t be able to host the files using Soft8Soft services, and would need to use either AWS or Azure servers. Ideally, the goal is to stream fairly complicated, high quality Verge3D interactions to remote laptops and mobile devices internationally. Based on your experience and professional opinions, is one service better for hosting/streaming Verge3D interactions than the other?

    Also, do you have any documentation outlining the specs/requirements a server and/or cloud-based service would need to have in order to minimize load times and lag as much as possible (ignoring costs for the time being)?

    Thank you! -Patrick

    patrick.c.belt@gmail.com

    #40993

    Hi Patrick,
    We have been using AWS for 5 years and I’d say we’re quite satisfied with the services. On my opinion, the server specs are not so important as properly configured content delivery network (CDN). Since the Amazon’s CloudFront CDN has more than 200 edge locations around the globe, you can make loading of your web application really quick.

    Soft8Soft Tech Chief
    X | FB | LinkedIn

    #41006
    patrickbelt
    Customer

    Thank you for the quick reply Alexander.

    patrick.c.belt@gmail.com

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.