We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.

Ok, I Agree

Cascade shadows and transparency

Home › Forums › General Questions › Cascade shadows and transparency

Tagged: 

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • 2024-06-28 at 4:28 pm #75660
    安娜
    Participant

    Seeing the promotion of version 4.6, I was very interested in the cascading shadows inside, so I tested it. It was indeed perfect in a simple model, but it was terrible in complex or transparent scenes! Incorrect projection and loss.

    2024-06-28 at 4:31 pm #75661
    安娜
    Participant

    1

    • This reply was modified 5 months, 3 weeks ago by 安娜.
    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    2024-06-28 at 4:54 pm #75664
    安娜
    Participant

    https://f01-1309918226.file.myqcloud.com/504/2024/06/29/Test06/Test06.html?x-cos-traffic-limit=819200

    2024-06-28 at 6:10 pm #75666
    kdv
    Participant

    In complex and even large scenes they can be nearly perfect https://v3d.net/v5d
    Transparency has never been supported by any type of shadow maps in v3d.js. In three.js only alpha-clipped transparent shadows are supported https://v3d.net/ec5

    Puzzles and JS coding. Fast and expensive.

    If you don’t see the meaning in something it primarily means that you just don’t see it but not the absence of the meaning at all.

    2024-06-29 at 8:10 am #75674
    visualizer
    Customer

    Try using baked effects they will produce faster & reliable results, Including appearing and disappearing parts

    2024-07-01 at 12:07 am #75693
    kdv
    Participant

    Yeap, for static trees with alpha-blended textures it’s better to bake shadows in Cycles.

    Puzzles and JS coding. Fast and expensive.

    If you don’t see the meaning in something it primarily means that you just don’t see it but not the absence of the meaning at all.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.